Following unsuccessful motions to dismiss, the defendants moved to compel arbitration, arguing that they had not moved to compel the matter to arbitration earlier because the plaintiffs had not yet completed all stages of the...more
Defendants-appellees picked up work orders from the plaintiff-appellant in its Florida offices, performed field work in Florida, and sent invoices to the plaintiff-appellant in Texas, who eventually stopped paying the...more
Schuyler Line Navigation Co., LLC (“SLNC”) argued, in part, that the arbitrator’s partiality should be inferred from his previous representation of KPI Bridge Oil, Inc. (“KPI”) and its affiliates, alleged hope for future...more
Interstate National Dealer Services, Inc. (“INDS”) challenged an arbitration award pursuant to OCGA § 9-9-13(b)(3), alleging the arbitrators overstepped their authority, and (5) the arbitrator’s manifest disregard of the law....more
In a dispute over Uber’s alleged failure to provide a wheelchair-accessible ride-sharing option in New Orleans, the District Court held that, under California law, plaintiffs were not equitably estopped from avoiding...more
In opposing a motion to compel arbitration, Nueces County made two procedural arguments: first, that the carrier waived its right to arbitrate by virtue of the policy’s service-of-suit clause....more
9/10/2020
/ Arbitration ,
Arbitration Agreements ,
Hurricane Harvey ,
Insurance Claims ,
Lloyds of London ,
McCarran-Ferguson Act ,
Mediation ,
Motion to Compel ,
Policy Terms ,
Property Damage ,
Real Estate Market
The petitioner unsuccessfully sought to vacate an arbitration award permitting Uber’s use of a “surge” pricing algorithm to set fares, arguing that comments made by the arbitrator reflected his “evident partiality” toward...more
An arbitrator resolved a dispute between the parties in favor of the union, deciding that Exide Technologies had violated the collective bargaining agreement and the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by unilaterally...more
The applicant sought to require documents and deposition testimony from an individual located in, and a corporation headquartered in, New York for use in an international arbitration initiated against the Republic of...more
7/29/2020
/ 28 U.S.C. § 1782 ,
Admissibility ,
Admissible Evidence ,
Arbitration ,
Discovery ,
Document Productions ,
Foreign Jurisdictions ,
Foreign Tribunals ,
International Arbitration ,
International Litigation ,
Statutory Requirements ,
Subpoenas
The plaintiffs filed a class action against Domino’s, alleging that the company’s franchise agreement violated federal antitrust law as well as state law. Domino’s moved to compel arbitration, and the plaintiffs opposed on...more
The petitioner challenged an arbitration award on the basis that it conflicted with public policy. “[T]he Third Circuit has explained that this exception does not … sanction a broad judicial power to set aside arbitration...more
A customer argued that he is not bound to the arbitration clause included in Amazon’s conditions of use since August 2011 because he never received notice of the clause or manifested his assent to it. Nonetheless, the...more
The Western District of Texas had previously concluded that there was no “meeting of the minds” between the parties with respect to arbitration and denied the defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. On appeal, the Fifth...more
Petitioner sought to vacate an arbitration award, arguing that the arbitration panel exceeded its authority in interpreting the terms of an insurance policy when it determined that certain claims fell within the policy’s...more
Following clarification by the arbitrator of his arbitration award, the parties sought confirmation, vacature, and/or modification of the award. The court found the award lacked finality: the issue of warrants was before the...more
After the plaintiffs filed a fourth amended complaint, certain defendants sought to compel arbitration and stay further federal court proceedings. The plaintiffs did not oppose the motions, which argued that the subject...more
The petitioner filed a complaint seeking to vacate an arbitration award, and the respondents moved to dismiss. Despite “the deferential standard of review” given to arbitration awards and the petitioner’s “significantly...more
Where the parties to a private arbitration in the United Kingdom disagreed as to whether the arbitration panel is a “foreign or international tribunal” for purposes of obtaining testimony from residents in South Carolina...more
The defendant sought to vacate an arbitration award, arguing that the arbitrator prejudiced the defendant by refusing to order discovery it requested and failed to apply California law to the analysis of attorneys’ fees and...more
Following a 2007 settlement concerning the allocation of investigation and remediation costs incurred due to environmental contamination at an industrial complex, the parties agreed to resolve the litigation between the...more
3/6/2020
/ Abuse of Power ,
Arbitration ,
Arbitration Agreements ,
Arbitration Award Challenges ,
Arbitration Awards ,
Contaminated Properties ,
Environmental Violations ,
Evidence ,
Public Policy ,
Settlement Agreements ,
Vacated
In a challenge to an arbitration award on the basis that the arbitrators exceeded their powers in determining damages, the Third Circuit affirmed the District of New Jersey’s confirmation of the award....more
In addition to awarding monetary damages against the defendants, the arbitration panel ordered that the defendants be divested of their shares in the plaintiff corporation. The defendants sought to vacate the award, arguing...more
2/24/2020
/ Arbitration ,
Arbitration Agreements ,
Arbitration Award Challenges ,
Arbitration Awards ,
Arbitrator Selection Disputes ,
Arbitrators ,
Business Disputes ,
Business Litigation ,
Contract Terms ,
Damages ,
Divestment ,
Motion to Vacate ,
Preferred Shares ,
Punitive Damages
When two parties in an arbitration were unable to select a “mutually agreeable” arbitrator, the Massachusetts district court stepped in to handle the selection. The parties’ arbitration agreement provided that the parties...more
The plaintiff moved to vacate an arbitration award and the defendant moved to dismiss and confirm. The defendant’s dismissal motion challenged confirmation of an arbitration award, arguing that the matter was filed in...more
1/28/2020
/ Arbitration ,
Arbitration Agreements ,
Arbitration Awards ,
Confidentiality Agreements ,
Contract Terms ,
Federal Arbitration Act ,
Federal Rule 12(b)(6) ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Motion to Vacate ,
Service of Process ,
Statute of Limitations ,
Summary Judgment
In reversing a New York federal court, the Second Circuit found the arbitration was within the arbitrator’s authority in binding absent class members to class proceedings because, by signing the operative arbitration...more