Despite Prior Suits, Policyholder Entitled to Coverage for DOJ Investigation -
Why it matters: A policyholder was entitled to coverage for a Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation despite already facing possibly...more
11/5/2015
/ Advertising Injury ,
Applications ,
Breach of Contract ,
Breach of Duty ,
Commercial General Liability Policies ,
Construction Defects ,
Copyright ,
Copyright Infringement ,
Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing ,
Cross Motions ,
D&O Insurance ,
Denial of Insurance Coverage ,
Department of Justice (DOJ) ,
Discovery ,
Duty to Defend ,
Food Recalls ,
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) ,
Heinz ,
Injunctive Relief ,
Insurance Litigation ,
Motion for Reconsideration ,
Motion for Summary Judgment ,
Omissions ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Policy Limits ,
Qui Tam ,
Right to Control ,
Trademark Infringement ,
Travelers ,
Treble Damages ,
Unfair Competition
Good News for Corporate Policyholders: Insurer Cannot Refuse Coverage Based on Insured's Assignment of Rights Under Policies After Loss Has Occurred -
Why it matters: Reversing its holding in a 2003 case, the Supreme...more
8/28/2015
/ Abatement ,
Asbestos Litigation ,
Attorney's Fees ,
Bad Faith ,
CA Supreme Court ,
Carbon Emissions ,
CERCLA ,
Clean Air Act ,
Commercial General Liability Policies ,
Consent Decrees ,
Consent to Assignment ,
Cumis Counsel ,
D&O Insurance ,
Duty to Defend ,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ,
Environmental Remediation Costs ,
FDIC ,
Fluor ,
Hartford Casualty Ins. ,
Hartford Insurance Company ,
Indemnification ,
Insurance Litigation ,
Insureds ,
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company ,
Mitigation ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Receivership
California Court: Rejected Demand Within Policy Limits Not Necessary for Bad Faith Claim -
Why it matters: Insurers must proceed with caution when they become aware that a settlement within policy limits is possible,...more
7/16/2015
/ Appeals ,
Bad Faith ,
Breach of Contract ,
CERCLA ,
Commercial General Liability Policies ,
Counterclaims ,
D&O Insurance ,
Declaratory Relief ,
Duty to Defend ,
Duty to Settle ,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ,
Homeowner's Insurance ,
Homeowners Association (HOA) ,
Insurance Industry ,
Insurance Litigation ,
Insureds ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Policy Limits ,
Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) ,
Scope of Coverage ,
Scope of the Claim ,
Summary Judgment ,
TX Supreme Court
No Policy? No Problem, The First Circuit Rules In A Coverage Dispute -
Why it matters: This case addresses the standard for pleading a missing insurance policy where the alleged insured, a private educational...more
6/22/2015
/ Commercial General Liability Policies ,
Commercial Insurance Policies ,
D&O Insurance ,
E&O Policies ,
Exclusions ,
Insurance Industry ,
Investment Adviser ,
Lloyds of London ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Ponzi Scheme ,
Restaurant Industry
No Policy? No Problem, The First Circuit Rules In A Coverage Dispute -
Why it matters: This case addresses the standard for pleading a missing insurance policy where the alleged insured, a private educational...more
California Appellate Court: All Claims “Arising From” Ponzi Scheme Are Precluded -
Why it matters: Concluding that any claims related to a Ponzi scheme—even if they involved different investors, investments, or...more
5/7/2015
/ Appeals ,
Arbitration ,
Broker-Dealer ,
Claims Made Policy ,
Class Action ,
D&O Insurance ,
GA Supreme Court ,
Insurance Litigation ,
Investment Adviser ,
Liability Insurance ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Ponzi Scheme ,
Workplace Injury
Insured v. Insured Exclusion Ambiguous When Applied to FDIC, 11th Circuit Rules -
Why it matters:
In the continuing split among courts considering insured v. insured exclusions, the Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court...more
1/14/2015
/ Appeals ,
Banks ,
Class Action ,
Counterclaims ,
D&O Insurance ,
Duty to Cooperate ,
Duty to Defend ,
Excessive Fees ,
FDIC ,
Litigation Fees & Costs ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Reservation of Rights ,
US Bank
Court’s Decision Prompts Policyholders to Seek Defense Quickly or Risk Awaiting Conclusion of Coverage Action to See Reimbursement -
Why it matters:
A policyholder who does not act promptly to seek advancement...more
10/23/2014
/ AIG ,
Attorney's Fees ,
Banks ,
Choice-of-Law ,
D&O Insurance ,
Duty to Defend ,
FDIC ,
Insurance Industry ,
Late Notices ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Voluntary Payments
D&Os Entitled to Unfettered Access to Bankrupt Company’s Policy Proceeds to Fund Defense Costs:
Why it matters -
In an important victory for directors and officers of a bankrupt company, a New York court...more
9/26/2014
/ Bad Faith ,
Commercial Bankruptcy ,
Commercial General Liability Policies ,
Corporate Officers ,
D&O Insurance ,
Directors ,
Excess Policies ,
Litigation Fees & Costs ,
Reservation of Rights ,
Securities Litigation ,
TCPA
Washington Supreme Court Rules That It Was Error To Delay Adjudication Of Insurer’s Duty To Defend, But Should Stay Discovery As To Insurer’s Coverage Defenses -
Why it matters:
The Washington Supreme Court...more
Second Circuit: Insurer Must Defend Where Factual Allegations Create a Possibility of Coverage -
Why it matters:
In a recent pro-policyholder decision, the Second Circuit, applying New York law, reminded...more
Policyholder Entitled to Select Counsel, Even Where Insurer Withdrew Reservation of Rights -
Why it matters:
An insured dissatisfied with counsel selected by its insurer was entitled to select counsel of its...more