A WARNing for Related Entities

more+
less-

When are related entities part of one “employer” under the WARN Act? When they function as one employer. In Guippone v. BH S&B Holdings LLC et al., No. 12.183-cv, 2013 WL 6439354 (2nd Cir. Dec. 10, 2013), the 2nd Circuit Court had to decide whether an employer and the holding company that had sole responsibility for managing the employer would be liable together for failure to notify workers of a mass layoff. The court applied a five factor test, derived from the Department of Labor: (1) common ownership, (2) common directors and/or officers, (3) de facto exercise of control, (4) unity of personnel policies emanating from a common source, and (5) the dependency of operations. The evidence showed that the employer had no board of directors. Instead, the holding company chose the employer’s management and negotiated the employer’s financing, and—most importantly—there was evidence that the holding company actually made the layoff decision. A jury will ultimately have to decide the issue, but the decision is a reminder that separate incorporation does not separate the corporation.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Sherman & Howard L.L.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×