"Activist Shareholders in the U.S.: A Changing Landscape"

by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Contact

Nature and Direction of Change

Shareholder activism in the U.S. has increased significantly over the past several years, with activist campaigns increasingly targeting well-known, larger market capitalization companies, such as Apple, Hess, Procter & Gamble and Sony. In 2013, the number, nature and degree of success of these campaigns has garnered the attention of boards of directors, shareholders and the media. While the continued level of success of activists is uncertain, and the longer-term impact of activism is unknown, at the moment shareholder activism is exerting considerable influence in the M&A and corporate governance arenas. In this evolving landscape, public company boards and their managements need to be aware that virtually any company is a potential target for shareholder activism.

Key Factors Influencing the Current Paradigm

Activism has become a viable and increasingly applied (arguably mainstream) tool for shareholders to seek to influence corporate policy. Several changes have occurred over the past few years that have contributed to the heightened — although not universal — success now being enjoyed by activism, including factors related to the activists, institutional investors and corporate defenses.

  • Greater financial firepower —“dry powder” — has become available to activist shareholders, permitting them to make larger and more investments. This increased financial firepower derives to a significant extent from institutional investors that, in seeking “alpha” returns, have turned to activist investor funds as a legitimate alternative asset class.
  • New activist funds have emerged on the scene, including so-called “Son of Activist” funds, or funds started by individuals who previously worked for — and learned their trade from — well-known, successful activists.
  • Activists have become more sophisticated in selecting their platforms and more nuanced in approach, sometimes seeking incremental change and longer-term involvement with target companies rather than solely focusing on short-term gains. They also are running more professional campaigns than in prior years, hiring financial and legal advisors to perform in-depth analyses of target companies, providing written presentations to targets and investors, and seeking more qualified candidates to serve as nominees for the boards of directors of target companies.
  • Activists have been receiving greater support from traditional long equity investors. Institutional investors that might not themselves agitate for change are increasingly willing to support activist campaigns rather than simply pursue the path of selling shares of companies they believe are underperforming. Supporting activists has largely lost the stigma that it had among traditional institutional investors, which once may have viewed activists as a disruptive influence acting contrary to the long-term interests of the company, but today view activist investors as a useful tool. In fact, some institutional shareholders are reportedly encouraging activists to agitate at underperforming companies in their portfolio.
  • There has been a significant increase in media attention to activist situations. This media attention, often sympathetic to activist platforms, has become another important tool in the activist arsenal, as it is a low cost way to pressure companies.
  • Large-cap companies have become more vulnerable. By and large, they have lost their classified boards and shareholder rights plans, often a direct result of corporate governance activist initiatives. Accordingly, they are more exposed to rapid accumulations of shares and contests for board control.

Expanding Activist Agenda

The appearance of an activist has often been a catalyst for M&A or similar activity. One common activist tactic has been to press a target’s board to consider strategic alternatives involving the company, including urging one or more actions, such as sale of the company or significant assets, enhancing dividends, and/or share buy backs, spin-offs or break-ups. Often this tactic has been perceived — and challenged — by targets and others as pursuit of short-term, event-driven gain over longer-term sustained value creation, and this has been the core criticism of activist investors. Without abandoning pursuit of these alternatives in particular situations, some activist shareholders have expanded their agenda to encompass longer term objectives in other situations. Indeed, some have fashioned themselves as “operational activists” who claim they will roll-up their sleeves and help fix under-performing businesses.

Prudent Preparation — Some Key Steps

In view of the uptick in shareholder activism, public companies must remain vigilant to avoid being surprised by an activist accumulation and should be prepared in advance to deal with an activist approach.

  • Stock watch programs; awareness of activists. Every public company should have a stock watch program to monitor the trading patterns of the company’s shares, as well as to keep track of ownership reporting on SEC forms. Such a program can help spot unusual trading activity and determine which entities are accumulating stakes in the company. In conjunction with the stock watch program, companies and investor relations departments should be familiar with activist identities and aware of which activists have been active recently with companies in the same industry.
  • Monitoring all other advance warning sources. The usual warning signs (13f, 13D, HSR filings and unusual trading volume) are often, but not always, the first indications that an activist investor has taken an interest in a company. Many times, the first indication that an activist is looming is from the activist investor itself via a letter, a revelation made at an investor/activist conference, or attendance on a quarterly earnings call. It’s important to remember that there are significant advantages to activists remaining undetected until they have amassed a significant stake in the company.
  • Shareholder outreach — in advance. Companies need to maintain an effective, ongoing shareholder outreach program. The focus should be on where the company stands today and what management’s strategy is for the future, especially as it relates to increasing short- and long-term shareholder value. Ongoing communications with significant shareholders in a manner compliant with Regulation FD help both to ensure that investors understand the company’s story and to provide an important avenue for feedback regarding shareholder views. The strength of the relationship with shareholders and whether shareholders trust management can make all the difference in the world if an activist situation emerges. This trust cannot be built only after an activist shows interest in the company or after a proxy contest has been threatened. Keeping shareholders close, maintaining contact and assessing internal voting and investment processes of institutional investors will help keep shareholder support if an activist situation materializes.
  • Comprehensive communications planning. Related to shareholder outreach, companies need to implement a comprehensive communications plan focused not only on significant institutional investors, but also on the broader market and analyst community. Today, successful defenses against activists are won or lost not with legal defenses, but largely on the success of the communications and investor relations plan. The company will have more credibility among its shareholders if it promotes its strategic plan well before a specific demand is made, as opposed to developing the plan in reaction to a demand from any activist.
  • Advance formation of a team. Forming a team before an activist shareholder appears on the scene, comprised of key insider personnel and outside professionals, will serve two critical functions: (a) permitting the company to become educated about shareholder activism in all its facets (and there are many) in a calm atmosphere, and to engage in thoughtful planning regarding how to react should an activist shareholder situation arise, and (b) avoiding what can be costly mistakes (including through delay) in receiving critical, informed advice and making important decisions if and when an activist shareholder surfaces.
  • Understand critical choices, critical duties and context. If a proposal from a shareholder activist is received, the target’s board and management often will quickly be faced with important threshold decisions, such as whether and, if so, in what manner to meet with and perhaps engage with the activist. Advance exploration of what considerations may be relevant to these decisions (depending, of course, on the nature and specifics of the proposal) can be very valuable to directors and management, including understanding various contextual settings that might apply. For example: Is the proposal public? Is it accompanied by a proposed director election contest? How has the company been performing relative to its peers, operationally and on a stock valuation basis? Have shareholders been frustrated or unhappy with management? What is the make-up of the shareholder base? Equally valuable for the board and management is to have considered in advance both what their duties are — and are not — in the face of an activist initiative, and how the decisions they make in exercising their duties may play out. Given the pressures that activists often seek to apply in particular to the directors of a target company, it seems prudent to provide them with a clear day reminder that they are statutorily vested with the authority and obligation to manage the company.

While almost all public companies are potential targets of shareholder activism in today’s world, with advance planning, they can reduce the risk of undetected activist accumulation and be prepared to analyze effectively and deal with shareholder activist proposals. Moreover, if a potential target company has been in dialogue with shareholders and market professionals articulating a credible plan for value creation, it may both reduce the risk of an activist campaign and better position itself to defend that plan if a campaign is launched.

Download PDF

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Contact
more
less

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!