Another Reason Not to Misclassify Employees

more+
less-

As reported in prior Snell & Wilmer publications (See September 2011 Workplace Word, October 2011 Workplace Word and January 9, 2013 Legal Alert), there are numerous reasons why employers need to ensure that they do not treat common law employees as independent contractors. Now, there is another risk for employers who misclassify employees. 

As reported in our recent Navigating Health Care Reform Alert, employer shared responsibility penalties (commonly referred to as the “large employer play or pay penalties”) take effect on January 1, 2014 for employers with 50 or more full-time plus full-time equivalent employees. Under those rules, misclassifying employees puts employers at risk of having to pay an Internal Revenue Code Section 4980H subsection (a) or subsection (b) penalty, with respect to its group health plan, and the penalties can be quite significant.

Example:  Employer A has 100 full-time common law employees, but misclassifies 10 of them as independent contractors. Employer A offers minimum essential health coverage that provides minimum value and is affordable to the 90 employees. Employer A believes it has designed its group health plan to avoid both the subsection (a) and (b) penalties. Unfortunately, it has not. By only offering coverage to 90% of its full-time common law employees, it is subject to a subsection (a) penalty if even one of the employees it misclassified as an independent contractor receives subsidized coverage through a Health Benefit Exchange. The potential subsection (a) annual penalty for failing to offer coverage to at least 95% of its full-time employees is $2,000 x (100 full-time employees - 30) = $140,000.[1] Unfortunately, the subsection (a) penalty applies to all full-time employees, not just the 10 misclassified full-time employees who were not offered group health plan coverage. 

The first step in complying with the employer shared responsibility penalties is to make sure that all common law employees are being treated as such as required by IRS rules. Employers should carefully consider whether 1099 independent contractors, temporary workers and other similar workers are really common law employees. If they are, they must be counted in determining whether the employer is “large” (i.e., meets the 50 employee threshold to be subject to the penalties) and, if they work on a full-time basis, they must be offered group health plan coverage meeting certain requirements in order to avoid the Code Section 4980H subsection (a) and (b) penalties.

Complying with the large employer play or pay penalties is very complicated and misclassifying workers is just one of many traps for the unwary. 

_______________
Notes

[1] The proposed regulations include a 95% coverage rule, the purpose of which is to provide employers with a margin of error in the event they fail to provide coverage (inadvertently or intentionally) to a small group of full-time employees.

Topics:  Affordable Care Act, Healthcare, Independent Contractors, IRS, Misclassification, Pay or Play, Penalties

Published In: Health Updates, Insurance Updates, Labor & Employment Updates, Tax Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Snell & Wilmer | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »