Bowman v. Monsanto: Crisis Averted on IP Protection for Self-Replicating Technologies

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

Life science companies in general (and seed companies in particular) are breathing a sigh of relief following the Supreme Court’s decision yesterday in Bowman v. Monsanto.

As Bowman wended its way through district court to the Federal Circuit, the rulings were consistent that Mr. Bowman — a farmer who planted multiple generations of seeds with Monsanto’s technology without paying Monsanto for the seeds — had infringed Monsanto’s patents. These rulings were in line with court precedents that the “patent exhaustion” doctrine did not give a purchaser the right to make new copies of a patented invention. When the Supreme Court granted certiorari, however, there was cause for concern that the Federal Circuit might be reversed, putting IP protection for self-replicating life science inventions in jeopardy.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide