California Bans Out-of-State Law

Sherman & Howard L.L.C.
Contact

Sherman & Howard L.L.C.

California has passed a novel piece of employment law.  New section 925 of the California Labor Code prohibits employers from requiring employees to sign an agreement that (a) forces the employee to litigate or arbitrate outside California if the claims arise from events (e.g. living and working) inside California; and (b) specifies that the laws of another state governs any “substantive” legal issue.  The bill exempts employees who are represented by counsel in negotiating the agreement.  The law takes effect Jan. 1, 2017.  http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/sen/sb_1201-1250/sb_1241_bill_20160925_chaptered.pdf

The consequence of using your same old employment agreement form in California now is that venue and choice-of-law provisions that specify states other than California are voidable, at the option of the employee.  And employers get to pay any attorney fees the employee incurs in pointing out this issue to the employer.  Be warned.  Of course, this is yet another full-frontal assault on employment arbitration by the State of California.  It appears that the state thrives on creating arbitration uncertainty that should ultimately be struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Sherman & Howard L.L.C.
Contact
more
less

Sherman & Howard L.L.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide