California Class Actions: 2018 Update

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed
Contact

I. TWO SCOTUS DECISIONS THAT MATTERED -

A. Litigation Tourism, Type 1: Bristol-Myers Squibb. -

If you are sued by a “litigation tourist” in a class or mass action and suit is not brought in your home state, you now have a no-jurisdiction defense.

In Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court, 137 S. Ct. 1773, 1781 (2017), the U.S. Supreme Court held that California lacked personal jurisdiction in a case brought by out-of-state consumers against an out-of-state defendant. The California Supreme Court thought that California could exercise “specific” jurisdiction based on the company’s significant marketing activities and personnel based in California and because defendant had contracted with a California distributor to distribute the drug nationally, especially where the resident and nonresidents all alleged the same injury. The Supreme Court said no...

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed
Contact
more
less

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide