California Supreme Court Holds That Liability for Attorney Fees Is Not Included Under the Made Whole Rule


In a decision issued today, the California Supreme Court put to rest the question of whether, in the automobile med-pay insurance context, attorney fees incurred by an insured to obtain a third-party recovery is taken into consideration in determining whether that insured has been "made-whole." The California Supreme Court held in the negative. Instead, those fees are subject to a separate equitable apportionment rule (the "common fund" doctrine).

In its conclusion, the California Supreme Court held...

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Insurance Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Barger & Wolen | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


The attorneys with Barger & Wolen are best known for their representation of insurance companies.... View Profile »

Follow Barger & Wolen:

Reporters on Deadline