For Lawyers | Log In | Join | Upload
WORKING... advanced

Litigant Is Not Entitled To Attorney Fees Where Insurer Disputes Request For Medical Treatment

more+
less-

In Smith v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, 2009 DJDAR 6715, May 11, 2009, the California Supreme Court decided a case concerning the contours of Labor Code §4607. That statute provides:

“Where a party to a proceeding institutes proceedings to terminate an award made by the appeals board to an applicant for continuing medical treatment and is unsuccessful in such proceedings, the appeals board may determine the amount of attorney’s fees reasonably incurred by the applicant in resisting the proceeding to terminate the medical treatment, and may assess such reasonable attorney’s fees as a cost upon the party instituting the proceedings to terminate the award of the appeals board.”

Please see full post for more information.


LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Labor & Employment Law Updates, Worker’s Compensation Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Personal Injury Updates, Insurance Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Barger & Wolen | Attorney Advertising

×

Expand Your Reach

JD Supra gets your content noticed, increases your visibility and makes your marketing efforts hassle free...

Learn More  or  Schedule a demo