Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements in Massachusetts

by Littler
Contact

A flurry of new decisions from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) and the U.S. Supreme Court have approved the use of class action waivers in arbitration agreements.  These decisions affirm that employers in Massachusetts can dramatically reduce their exposure to employment law class actions by adopting arbitration agreements that contain class action waivers.

In Massachusetts, employers may require employees to enter into arbitration agreements as a condition of employment (or as a condition of continued employment).1  These agreements mandate that employees resolve employment law disputes before an arbitrator rather than in court.  Until recently, however, it had been unclear whether an arbitration agreement can waive an employee’s ability to bring a claim as a class action (that is, a legal action filed by one person on behalf of many other similarly situated individuals).  On one hand, the SJC ruled in 2009 that arbitration agreements could not ban class actions in cases where the statute under which the employees sought relief explicitly authorized the filing of class actions.2  Since many employment law statutes contain this type of language, some practitioners in Massachusetts assumed class action waivers in arbitration agreements would not be enforced in lawsuits involving these statutes.  On the other hand, in 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court found in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion that a similar state ruling in California was preempted by the federal arbitration statute, and the Supreme Court ruled in favor of enforcement of the class waiver in an arbitration agreement.3

Earlier this summer, the SJC revisited the class action waiver issue in a pair of decisions, Feeney v. Dell, Inc.4 and Machado v. System4 LLC.5  In Feeney, the SJC deferred to the U.S. Supreme Court’s finding in Concepcion that state law cannot automatically prohibit class action waivers, regardless of what a statute may say about class actions.  However, the SJC carved out an exception.  It found that if a person can prove that he or she could not realistically bring a case individually, because the cost and complexity of the case far exceeds the potential recovery of individual damages, then the class action waiver was void.  For instance, in Feeney, the plaintiffs’ potential damages in their consumer fraud case were as low as $13 each.  The SJC reasoned that no one would bring a complex consumer case for so little money, and therefore the only way such claims could be heard would be as a class action (where the damages would be multiplied over numerous class members).  As a result, in Feeney, the SJC refused to enforce the class action waiver provision in the arbitration agreement, and ordered the class action to proceed in court. 

While Feeney was a consumer case, Machado v. System4 LLC, decided the same day, is squarely in the employment context.  In that case, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in court as a class action, alleging defendant System4 wrongfully misclassified them as “franchisees” when in fact they were employees.  The plaintiffs sought lost wages and other damages under the Massachusetts wage and hour laws as a result of the alleged misclassifications.  Because the plaintiffs had signed arbitration agreements with class action waivers, System4 moved to compel individual (not class) arbitration.  The trial court judge denied that motion.

The SJC reversed the trial judge, finding that the class arbitration waiver was valid and enforceable.  While the Massachusetts wage and hour laws expressly allow for class actions, the SJC nonetheless held that statutory language alone would not invalidate a class action waiver, in line with Feeney and Concepcion.  The SJC next considered whether the plaintiffs’ potential recovery was large enough to justify individual arbitration.  Because the plaintiffs sought at least $10,000 each, and the wage and hour laws permitted the plaintiffs to recover attorney’s fees if they prevailed, the SJC held that their claims were not “so small as to preclude the bringing of claims in individual arbitration.”  Therefore, the SJC ordered that each of the plaintiffs pursue their wage and hour claims in individual arbitrations and not as a class.

Despite these two decisions, the U.S. Supreme Court may end up having the last word on the issue of class waivers in arbitration agreements.  Only a week after the SJC decided Feeney and Machado, the Supreme Court issued yet another decision on class waivers in, American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant.6  The Supreme Court rejected a rule from a court in New York invalidating class waivers on grounds that were nearly identical to the potential-recovery exception adopted by Feeney.  In other words, according to the Supreme Court, the size of a potential recovery is not relevant to whether a class action waiver is enforceable.  Even if a person’s claims are too small to realistically bring a claim in individual arbitration, under the new American Express decision a court still cannot invalidate a class action waiver in an arbitration agreement.  It remains to be seen whether the SJC will reconsider Feeney regarding the potential-recovery exception, or whether that the SJC will wait for another opportunity to update its position and adopt the Supreme Court’s holding in American Express

Regardless of how Feeney turns out, the Machado decision has clarified much for employers in Massachusetts.  It is now clear that an employee’s arbitration agreement can include a class action waiver, which will be enforced in most instances.  While the Feeney potential-recovery exception arguably has been implicitly overruled by American Express, at the very least as a practical matter any employment claim worth at least $10,000 per employee will likely be found large enough even under the Feeney standard to render class action waivers in arbitration agreements enforceable.

While an arbitration agreement with a class action waiver can be a powerful way to lower the risk of class action liability, there are many complexities in drafting these agreements, setting up the arbitration process, rolling out the agreements to current and new employees and administering the agreements on a going forward basis.  As just the past few weeks have shown, this area of law is evolving at a breakneck pace.  Employers should consult with counsel to find an approach that best meets their business needs.


1 Warfield v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Inc., 454 Mass. 390 (2009).

2 Feeney v. Dell, Inc., 454 Mass. 192 (2009). 

3 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011).

4 --- Mass. ---, 2013 Mass. LEXIS 462 (June 12, 2013).

5 --- Mass. ---,  2013 Mass. LEXIS 461 (June 12, 2013).

6 --- U.S. ---, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4700 (June 20, 2013).

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Littler | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Littler
Contact
more
less

Littler on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.