Courts Begin To Split On Whistleblower Protection

The Fifth Circuit has held in Asadi v. G.E. Energy (USA), LLC that a whistleblower must provide information to the SEC in order to be protected by the Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation provisions.  The reasoning is pretty simple.  That’s the way the statute defines the term “whistleblower.”  The Court went as far as to reject the definition of “whistleblower” in the SEC’s rules.

We understand this to be the first appellate court decision on the issue.  As we have noted, district courts have ruled differently on the issue.

Topics:  Anti-Retaliation Provisions, Dodd-Frank, SEC, Whistleblower Protection Policies, Whistleblowers

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Rights Updates, Labor & Employment Updates, Securities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Stinson Leonard Street - Dodd-Frank and the Jobs Act | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »