D.C. Circuit Revives Data Breach Putative Class Action On Standing Grounds, Widens Circuit Split

by King & Spalding
Contact

On August 1, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit revived a data breach class action that was dismissed for lack of standing, holding that the district court improperly applied the Article III injury-in-fact standing requirement articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Clapper v. Amnesty Int’l USA, 568 U.S. 398 (2013). The Attias v. CareFirst, Inc. decision places the D.C. Circuit on one side of a widening circuit split over the issue of whether individuals whose sensitive personal information is lost, stolen, or otherwise compromised as a result of a data breach can satisfy the Article III injury requirement based solely on allegations of risk of potential future injury, such as the possibility of future identity theft.

The Attias case stems from a 2014 data breach by unknown hackers who infiltrated 22 CareFirst computers, compromising the unencrypted, sensitive, personal information of more than one million CareFirst policyholders in the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia. CareFirst discovered the data breach in April 2015, and notified its customers of the breach in May 2015. At that time, CareFirst offered its customers two years of free credit monitoring and identity theft protection to mitigate the risk of future identity theft or other issues.

Shortly thereafter, seven individuals filed a putative class action on behalf of all policyholders from D.C. , Maryland, and Virginia against CareFirst, alleging various state law claims relating to the hack of the CareFirst computers. According to the D.C. Circuit, the complaint alleged that the hack exposed the plaintiffs’ names, birthdates, email addresses, social security numbers, and credit card information. As to injury, the circuit court, citing the complaint, found that the plaintiffs alleged that the cyber-attack allowed access to sensitive information that could be used in the future by identity thieves to “‘open new financial account[s], incur charges in another person’s name,’ and commit various other financial misdeeds. ”  The D.C. Circuit held that such allegations were sufficient to establish Article III standing.

The district court had dismissed the complaint at the pleading stage for lack of constitutional standing, holding that the plaintiffs’ alleged injury—increased risk of identity theft—was insufficient. The district court found that the future harm alleged was not sufficiently concrete and particularized, but rather was too speculative to satisfy constitutional standing and the standard set forth in Clapper. In reversing the dismissal, the D.C. Circuit held that the plaintiffs’ allegation of potential future injury was sufficient for Article III standing, relying in part on its conclusion that the district court misunderstood the allegations of injury contained in the complaint when it found that the complaint did not assert exposure of the plaintiffs’ credit card and social security numbers. Citing the Supreme Court’s opinion in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1547 (2016), the circuit court further held that the plaintiffs’ alleged injury was “fairly traceable” to the defendant’s actions and that it was “likely to be redressed” by the relief sought.

The circuit court left open the question of whether the complaint fails to state a claim for which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), as well as the antecedent question of “whether plaintiffs properly invoked the district court’s diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332,” finding it inappropriate to “reach beyond the standing question. ”

As noted, the D.C. Circuit’s decision places it on one side of a growing circuit split regarding the sufficiency of allegations of potential future injury to satisfy constitutional standing requirements. The Sixth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits have held that such injury is sufficient for standing. The Second and Fourth Circuits have held to the contrary. The Eighth Circuit heard argument in May of 2017 in Alleruzzo v. Supervalu, No. 16-2378/16-2528. Arguably, the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Beck v. McDonald, 848 F.3d 262 (4th Cir. 2017), cert. denied sub. nom. Beck v. Shulkin, 137 S. Ct. 2307 (2017), can be distinguished factually, and in such a way that could be significant to the court’s ultimate conclusion on standing. The D.C. Circuit, quoting the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Remijas v. Neiman Marcus Group, 794 F.3d 688, 698 (7th Cir. 2015), queried: “‘Why else would hackers break into a . . . database and steal consumers’ private information?’  Presumably, the purpose of the hack is, sooner or later, to make fraudulent charges or assume those consumer’s identities. ”  In Beck, however, patient and consumer information was not compromised by a hack of a system or database, but was compromised when a laptop computer was stolen or misplaced. Both cases, however, involved databases containing sensitive information that lacked certain data security measures, such as encryption. We previously reported on the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Beck here.

The D.C. Circuit’s decision could significantly impact future data breach litigation. After the Supreme Court’s opinion in Spokeo, the lower courts have struggled to consistently define what constitutes a “concrete and particularized” injury for purposes of constitutional standing in data breach and privacy litigation. Arguably, the Attias case strengthens a data breach plaintiff’s likely argument that potential future injury, standing alone, can qualify as concrete and particularized injury-in-fact, particularly as it relates to intentional hacking by third parties of systems or database containing unencrypted, sensitive consumer information.

A copy of the D.C. Circuit’s opinion can be found here.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

King & Spalding
Contact
more
less

King & Spalding on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.