Defendant Does Not Infringe Due To Doctrine Of Permissible Repair

Morris James LLP
Contact

Drager Medical GmbH v. Allied Healthcare Products, Inc., C.A. No. 13-1656-SLR, March 27, 2015

Robinson, J.  Defendant’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement is granted.

The disputed technology relates to a carbon dioxide absorber for a rebreather system.  The patent-in-suit is a combination patent with a connection head and a housing (“canister”) to be inserted and removed from the adapter of the rebreathing system.  Defendant does not sell the combination; it sells only the canister housing.  The patent exhaustion doctrine limits the rights that survive the authorized sale of a patented item.  The court concludes that the doctrine of permissible repair is implicated.  Replacement of a spent canister is a permissible repair.  Defendant’s sales of canisters therefore do not infringe.

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide