Disability Discrimination and Protection of Pay

Faegre Baker Daniels

In G4S Cash Solutions (UK) Ltd v Powell UKEAT/0243/15, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether reducing an employee’s pay amounted to disability discrimination.

Mr Powell could longer perform his role as an engineer servicing ATMs because of a disability. To accommodate this, his employer created a new, albeit less skilled, role for him. Initially his pay was protected but his employer then proposed to reduce it by around 10 percent. Mr Powell refused the reduction and as a result was dismissed. He brought a claim for disability discrimination.

The EAT upheld his claim. The EAT held that the duty to make reasonable adjustments could include a requirement to protect an employee’s pay in certain circumstances. Such a conclusion may not be common but it may be what is reasonably required. Here, the employer was a company with considerable financial resources and such an adjustment was easily affordable.

This will be an unwelcome decision for employers. However, whether protection of pay (or any other adjustment) is reasonable will depend on the facts, and employers should consider each case on its merits.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Contact
more
less

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide