EEOC Sues Exact Sciences Laboratories for Age Discrimination in Hiring

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Contact

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

Cologuard Manufacturer Rejected Qualified Applicant It Viewed as Too Old, Federal Agency Charges

DENVER – Exact Sciences Laboratories, LLC, manufacturer of the Cologuard colon cancer screening test, violated federal law by discriminating against a job applicant based on his age, according to a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, John Larkin was interviewed for a professional medical sales representative role in 2018. Afterward, an Exact Sciences recruiting consultant told Larkin he was not selected because the company was seeking “more junior” job applicants. The company then hired a younger candidate instead, although Larkin was qualified for the position. Although Exact Sciences claimed Larkin was not hired because of salary information he provided when asked during his interview, the company then paid the younger person hired more than the amount it claims disqualified Larkin.

This alleged conduct violates the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) which prohibits discrimination based on age. The EEOC filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Exact Sciences Laboratories LLC, Case No.1:23-cv-00817, after first attempting to reach a settlement through its pre-litigation conciliation process.

“The ADEA requires employers to provide equal opportunities to job applicants 40 and older as they provide to younger applicants,” said Amy Burkholder, director of the EEOC’s Denver Field Office. “Employers are not free to discriminate based on age, or to refuse hire to applicants over 40 who may be making mid-career job transitions, and often bring valuable prior work experience.”

“Federal courts in age discrimination cases have recognized when employers use words like ‘too senior’ or ‘overqualified,’ to reject a job applicant, that is often just a euphemism for age discrimination, unless those descriptions are based on objective job qualifications,” said Mary Jo O’Neill, the EEOC’s regional attorney for the agency’s Phoenix District. “Employers should hire the best candidates based on job qualifications, not based on cultural stereotypes about older workers.”

The EEOC’s Phoenix District Office has jurisdiction for Arizona, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and part of New Mexico.

The EEOC advances opportunity in the workplace by enforcing federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. More information about age discrimination in employment is available at https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/fact-sheet-age-discrimination.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide