EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Continued: Did the Supreme Court Pave the Way for ADA Claims Based on Nonobvious Disabilities?

Baker Donelson
Contact

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court decided EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch, a Title VII case involving religious discrimination. While the case did not directly involve the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the accommodation analysis could bleed into ADA cases. In particular, should employers be on the lookout for nonobvious disabilities?

We wrote about EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch earlier this month here. As we explained, the Court determined that Abercrombie & Fitch unlawfully discriminated against a practicing Muslim when it denied her employment because her headscarf did not conform to its dress code or “look” policy. The fascinating aspect of the case is that the employer never discussed the headscarf with the applicant and thus only speculated as to its religious significance. Nevertheless, the Court ruled that "[a]n employer may not make an applicant's religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions."

While the case did not concern disabilities, the accommodation analysis frequently bleeds into the ADA from Title VII. So, are employers under a duty to reasonably accommodate a "suspected" disability? Likewise, will employers be forced into the role of diagnosing disabilities?

Given the difficulties associated with identifying physical and mental impairments, these questions sound silly. But is it really that big of a leap from the newly-minted obligation to accommodate unconfirmed religious practices to an obligation to accommodate unconfirmed disabilities?

Up to this point, employers have taken solace in the notion that it is the employee’s obligation to put an employer on notice of a disability or the need for an accommodation. But in the event that the concepts of EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch bleed into ADA cases, this may change. Whether and to what extent ADA cases will be impacted is not yet clear. Nevertheless, employers may want to reevaluate their ADA policies and procedures and consider a more proactive approach to providing accommodations. Ignorance may no longer be bliss.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Baker Donelson | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Baker Donelson
Contact
more
less

Baker Donelson on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide