Employment And Labor Alert: D.C. Circuit Invalidates NLRB's Posting Rule

by Stinson Leonard Street
Contact

On May 7, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit struck down the National Labor Relations Board's controversial notice posting rule (see Nat'l Assn. of Mfrs. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.). This development is the latest in the legal saga chronicled in our past Alerts (see here, here and here).

Notice Posting Rule

On August 30, 2011, the NLRB published a regulation requiring that employers notify employees of certain rights under the National Labor Relations Act. 76 Fed. Reg. 54006. The regulation purports to require employers to post a detailed notice conspicuously in the workplace and electronically. The mandated notice informs employees of their rights to organize, form, join or assist a union, bargain collectively, strike and picket, and discuss terms and conditions of employment.

The notice also provides examples of employer conduct that unlawfully infringes NLRA rights and offers information about enforcement and contacting the NLRB. Importantly, the regulation provides that employers who fail to post the notice may be found to have committed an unfair labor practice. Further, the regulation permits tolling of the limitations period for filing unfair labor practice charges if the notice is not posted, and provides that the NLRB may consider an employer's "knowing and willful refusal to comply with the requirement to post the employee notice as evidence of unlawful motive in a case in which motive is an issue."

The regulation—which would affect six million employers nationwide—was promptly challenged by a number of employer representatives. In March 2012, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia held that the NLRB could require employers to post the notice, but that the enforcement and tolling provisions exceeded the NLRB's authority delegated by Congress. Although scheduled to go into effect on April 30, 2012, the regulation was temporarily enjoined pending the appeal of the district court's decision to the D.C. Circuit (see previous Alert here).

D.C. Circuit Decision

On May 7, 2013, the D.C. Circuit held that the regulation was invalid. The court first reasoned that Section 8(c) of the NLRA states that the "expressing of any views, argument, or opinion, or the dissemination thereof . . . shall not constitute or be evidence of an unfair labor practice under any of the provisions of [the NLRA], if such expression contains no threat of reprisal or force or promise of benefit." This provision "manifested a congressional intent to encourage free debate on issues dividing labor and management." Also, the court recognized that employers have the First Amendment right "to engage in noncoercive speech about unionization." The court reasoned, "Although § 8(c) precludes the Board from finding noncoercive employer speech to be an unfair labor practice, or evidence of an unfair labor practice, the Board's rule does both."

The court rejected the NLRB's argument that the poster was "government speech," rather than the employer's speech, explaining that the right to free speech includes the right to choose not to speak. In other words "the right to disseminate another's speech necessarily includes the right to decide not to disseminate it." The court further held that the regulation's tolling of the limitations period impermissibly expanded the limitations period established by statute. Concluding that all three means for enforcing the posting requirement were invalid, the court held that the regulation, as a whole, could not stand. The court declined to decide whether the NLRB lacked the authority to issue the posting requirement of the rule. However, two concurring judges—a majority of the court—also concluded that the rule exceeded the Board's rulemaking authority under the NLRA.

Notably, the court found that the regulation was not affected by the NLRB quorum issue recently addressed by the D.C. Circuit, because the NLRB had at least three validly appointed members at the time the notice posting rule was filed with the Office of the Federal Register (see Noel Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. ).

Conclusion

The D.C. Circuit's decision establishes that the NLRB posting rule is without force or effect, and, therefore, employers are not required to comply. It remains to be seen whether the NLRB will seek review by the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision could also lead to challenges of other legally mandated postings. Further, the decision may be used to challenge tolling arguments in other contexts, such as where courts have equitably tolled limitations periods when employers failed to post notices required under Title VII or the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

Note that, in April 2012, the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina held that the NLRB lacked authority to promulgate the notice posting rule. The appeal of that case is pending before the Fourth Circuit.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Stinson Leonard Street | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Stinson Leonard Street
Contact
more
less

Stinson Leonard Street on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!