Employment Law Blog: Pregnancy Discrimination & The Accommodation Debate

by Davis Brown Law Firm
Contact

On Monday, July 14, the EEOC issued guidance relating to its current interpretation of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act and the Act’s interaction with the ADA and other laws.  

Over the last several years, the Iowa Civil Rights Commission has moved away from its more limited pre-existing stance on pregnancy discrimination now requiring higher levels of accommodation. Iowa, citing California cases and statutes, has widely opened the area of pregnancy discrimination essentially creating a rule without rule making that states that pregnant employees must receive all accommodations given to any other employee who has a disability or injury in the workplace. This would encompass ADA accommodation as well as light-duty programs for workers’ compensation.

The new EEOC guidance, which can be found at www.EEOC.gov, takes a similar viewpoint relying on a review of the fundamental Pregnancy Discrimination Act requirements, specifically, “Women affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions must be treated the same as other persons not so affected but similar in their ability or inability to work.” The EEOC makes clear that the statute covers current pregnancy as well as discrimination based on past pregnancies, potential or intended pregnancies and medical conditions related to pregnancy or child birth. This is a fairly broad array of potential claims for any company who employs women. The EEOC does indicate that close timing between the adverse employment action and something such as a prior pregnancy is a greater indication that an action is based on the pregnancy than it would be if there was a significant lapse of time.

In Section A.5. of its guidance, the EEOC is very clear that set asides for light duty for workers’ compensation are not acceptable under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. The EEOC specifically states, “An employer may not refuse to treat a pregnant worker the same as other employees who are similar in their ability or inability to work by relying on a policy that makes distinctions based on the source of the employee’s limitations (e.g., policy of providing light duty only to workers injured on the job).”

Of concern to many employers is the historically different treatment of workers’ compensation injuries. Employers may have some difficulty explaining to the worker’s compensation carrier why light duty is no longer available to an employee who is injured in a worker’s compensation matter because the only light duty positions available are currently filled by pregnant employees or others who need short-term accommodation. However, based on this guidance, as well as other cases and guidance related to the Americans with Disabilities Act, employers need to rethink their light duty process and positions. There are some options which would allow compliance with the law. The first is to have no specific light duty positions and to evaluate each and every injury individually and separately. This would entirely do away with the “make work” positions that are sometimes requested as part of the workers’ compensation process and would require specific evaluation of each job and light duty request. It would also require that the employer keep current and well crafted job descriptions so that essential functions can be fully addressed at the time of any request.  

The employer may also make a determination as to how many light duty positions it could have available. Example 11 in the EEOC guidance talks about a long-term care facility which has determined that there are five light duty positions available at any given time and that these are filled on a first come first serve basis. However, a complicating factor is evident in this scenario-how long does light duty last? For pregnancy related issues there is typically an end date in terms of accommodation. For other types of conditions there may not be an end date and it is not clear whether or not an employer can set a date certain by which light duty work would end and the employee would be moved out of a light duty position into Family and Medical Leave, administrative leave or something similar if he or she cannot fulfill the essential functions of a regular, non-light duty job. This would implicate accommodation requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act, however, the EEOC has not issued any guidance as to how long an accommodation must be provided before it becomes unreasonable.  Many employers may limit time on light duty to avoid the assumption of permanent light duty positions.

Of additional interest to Iowa employers are examples 17 and 18 contained within the guidance.  In example 17 it discusses the issue of an employer providing 10 weeks of paid pregnancy leave for medical leave for pregnancy to the mother and then an additional six weeks of paid leave to the male or female as “parental leave.” In this example, a male employee alleges that the policy is discriminatory; however, the EEOC makes a distinction between recovery from pregnancy and child birth and the provision of “parenting” leave stating that a policy which provides 6 weeks of parenting leave to each parent would not be discriminatory. However in example 18 the EEOC indicates that if parental leave was available exclusively for mothers, this would then be discriminatory towards fathers. If “parental leave” is offered it must be offered on “equal terms to women and men.” Pursuant to Iowa law, women giving birth are entitled to up to 8 weeks of unpaid pregnancy leave for recovery from child birth and related conditions. However, many employees who have normal pregnancies treat this 8 weeks, when they are not covered by FMLA, as the standard amount of time which they then take for parenting leave. In problem pregnancies employers may extend the leave past the eight weeks, but would this then be discriminatory to men?  It would depend upon these scenarios or the mother’s underlying medical condition. So employees who may have skipped medical return to work certificates for pregnancy would now need to gather such documentation in support of any additional “medical leave.”

This guidance, fact sheets and question and answers available on the EEOC.gov website are very new with little additional guidance on how certain components will be interpreted in the practical world. The timing of this is particularly complicated from a compliance standpoint as the United States Supreme Court has recently accepted Young v. UPS, Inc., U.S. No. 12-1226 (Cert Granted 7/1/14) which is a pregnancy accommodation and discrimination based case. It is possible that the Supreme Court will decide quite differently than the EEOC on pregnancy accommodation issues and significant changes in the guidance will be required.  It is also possible that the court will accept the reasoning of the EEOC which could potentially have a direct impact upon the Young case. In the interim employers must balance both Iowa and Federal law regarding pregnancy discrimination.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Davis Brown Law Firm | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Davis Brown Law Firm
Contact
more
less

Davis Brown Law Firm on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!