Employment Law Commentary -- Volume 24, No. 8 August 2012: Employment Practices After the EEOC’s Final Rule on Age Discrimination and Disparate-Impact Claims

more+
less-

On March 30, 2012, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued its Final Rule on Disparate Impact and Reasonable Factors Other than Age (RFOA). This rule became effective on April 30, 2012. The Final Rule explained the affirmative defense that employers have to disparateimpact claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and amended the Commission’s prior RFOA regulation, 29 C.F.R. § 1625.7.

The EEOC’s Final Rule sought to clarify the Supreme Court’s seminal rulings in Smith v. Jackson, 544 U.S. 228, (2005) and Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab, 554 U.S. 84 (2008). These cases broadly interpreted the ADEA, affirming the ability of employees to bring disparate-impact claims under the ADEA and placing the burden on employers to prove that a policy or practice that adversely impacts older workers is based on an RFOA. The Final Rule updates the EEOC’s regulations on these issues. While the full effect of the rule has yet to be seen, it will impose new obligations on employers seeking to avoid ADEA claims.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

CONNECT

Morrison & Foerster is an international firm with more than 1,000 lawyers across 15 offices in the... View Profile »


Follow Morrison & Foerster LLP: