Employment news - March 2018

Hogan Lovells
Contact

Hogan Lovells

Take two: dismissing pregnant workers

There have been two recent decisions on dismissing pregnant workers. The CJEU found that a collective redundancy is an exceptional situation justifying dismissal, while the EAT decided that an employer did not have to re-visit a decision to dismiss when it found out that an employee was pregnant.

MORE >

 

Informal approach – reasonable adjustments duty applied to long working hours

The Court of Appeal decision in United First Partners Research v Carreras is a useful reminder that employers may be under a duty to adjust long working hours, even if they are not imposed as a formal requirement.

MORE >

 

Retirement provision in LTIP not age discrimination

A provision in a long term incentive plan which gave employees favourable treatment if they left the business aged 55 or over was justified and not age discrimination according to the Court of Appeal in Air Products PLC v Cockram.

MORE >

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Hogan Lovells | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Hogan Lovells
Contact
more
less

Hogan Lovells on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide