It's no secret – protected conversation potentially admissible

The EAT decided in Harrison v Aryman Ltd that a claimant could potentially rely on a protected conversation in evidence. This was the case even though she had not expressly brought the exceptions to the normal rule that protected conversations are inadmissible to the tribunal's attention.

MORE >

All in the mind – employee refused to work because he had been denied a rest break

It was a working time detriment to threaten an employee with dismissal when he refused to return to work at a site where he had been denied a rest break, according to the EAT in Pazur v Lexington Catering Services Ltd.

MORE >

Sins of omission – changes to investigator's report did not make dismissal unfair

In Dronsfield v The University of Reading the EAT found that changes to an investigator's report into potential misconduct did not render an employee's subsequent dismissal unfair.

MORE >

[View source.]