Financial Services Weekly News - April 2016 #4

Goodwin
Contact

Regulatory Developments

Federal Banking Regulators Propose Net Stable Funding (Liquidity) Ratio

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) proposed a rule (the Proposed Rule) that would require U.S. banks with more than $250 billion in assets and more than $10 billion in foreign exposure to ensure that they have access to stable funding for at least a year. The Proposed Rule details what regulators consider appropriate sources of stable funding, including long-term debt, Tier 1 capital and core deposits, and separately lays out a "less stringent" standard for banks with between $50 billion and $250 billion in assets. The Proposed Rule will be open for public comment through August 5, 2016 and would be effective as of January 1, 2018.

Federal Regulators Propose New Incentive Compensation Rules

On April 26, the OCC, FDIC, Federal Reserve, Federal Housing Finance Agency, Securities and Exchange Commission, and the National Credit Union Administration unveiled a proposed rule (the Proposed Rule) to revise the proposed rule the agencies published in the Federal Register on April 14, 2011 to implement section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act). The Proposed Rule, among other things, would require executives at banks to defer a percentage of their qualifying incentive-based compensation for each performance period for four years. The deferral percentage would range from 40% to 60% of qualifying incentive-based compensation depending on the asset size and risk profile of the institution. Banks under $1 billion in assets are exempt from the Proposed Rule. The Proposed Rule will be open for comment until July 22, 2016.

Federal Reserve Implements New Procedures for Off-Site Loan Review for Small Banks

On April 19, the Federal Reserve issued SR Letter 16-8, which details procedures for examiners to conduct off-site loan reviews for community and small regional banks. State member banks and U.S. branches and agencies for foreign banking organizations with less than $50 billion in total assets can opt to allow Federal Reserve examiners to review loan files off-site, during both full-scope or target examinations, so long as loan documents can be sent securely and with the required information. While some banks may prefer an off-site loan review, the program is optional so that any bank can still choose an on-site review. The letter is part of the Federal Reserve’s ongoing efforts to improve efficiency and reduce regulatory burden while maintaining quality supervision.

FDIC Issues Final Rule on Small Bank Deposit Insurance

On April 26, the FDIC approved a final rule for assessing deposit insurance premiums on banks with assets under $10 billion. Under the rule, assessment rates will be calculated using financial measures and supervisory ratings derived from a statistical model estimating the probability of failure over three years. The final rule eliminates the risk categories currently used for banks that do not have a rating of CAMELS I or II, and instead bases assessment rates for all banks on a standardized formula. The final rule will take effect beginning the quarter after the FDIC’s deposit insurance fund reserve ratio reaches 1.15%, which is expected to occur in the third quarter of 2016.

Enforcement & Litigation

CFPB Takes Action Against Debt Collection Law Firm

On April 25, the CFPB ordered the debt collection law firm Pressler & Pressler, LLP, two principal partners, and New Century Financial Services, Inc., a debt buyer, to stop “churning out unfair and deceptive debt collection lawsuits based on flimsy or nonexistent evidence.” The consent orders bar the companies and individuals from illegal practices that can deceive or intimidate consumers, such as filing lawsuits without determining if debts in question are valid. The orders also require the firm and the named partners to pay $1 million, and New Century to pay $1.5 million to the Bureau’s Civil Penalty Fund.

CFPB Takes Action Against Co-Founders of Online Lead Aggregator

On April 21, the CFPB took action against two co-founders of a company that resold loan applications containing sensitive personal data to lenders and data brokers without assessing the sources of those leads or the purchasers they sold to. In complaints filed in federal court, the CFPB alleged that Dmitry Fomichev and Davit Gasparyan (also known as David Gasparyan) co-founded and operated T3Leads, a lead aggregator that bought and sold payday and installment loan applications without properly vetting buyers and sellers. A “lead aggregator” purchases personal information about consumers (“leads”) from lead generating websites and then sells those leads to interested businesses. The CFPB filed a separate lawsuit against T3Leads and two other individuals in December 2015.

Federal District Court Holds CFPB Lacked Authority to Issue CID

On April 21, Judge Leon of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a petition filed by the CFPB seeking to require an accreditor of for-profit colleges, Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools (ACICS), to answer a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) issued by the CFPB. Judge Leon held the CFPB did not have authority to investigate the process for accrediting for-profit schools because the subject matter falls outside its statutory authority to investigate whether there has been a violation of consumer financial laws. The Court rejected the CFPB’s argument that its CID was related to lending and financial-advisory services by for-profit schools, noting the accreditation process has no real connection to a school’s private lending practices and the CFPB’s claim that it is entitled to learn whether ACICS is connected to potential violations of consumer financial laws is belied by the CID’s statement of purpose and requests, which solely related to accreditation.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Goodwin | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Goodwin
Contact
more
less

Goodwin on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide