A West Virginia Court refused to dismiss an action brought under its state workers' compensation law. That law permits an employee to recover greater damages when deliberate intent exists.
An employee of a Hardee's franchised restaurant suffered first and second degree burns from spilled hot grease while manually cleaning a fryer box. The employee brought an action against the restaurant franchisee, as well as the franchisor. He claimed the franchisor should be liable based on allegedly having actual knowledge of unsafe working conditions at the restaurant, providing the equipment and setting the safety procedures.
The employee alleged the frying machine's pump and filter were broken for a long time, requiring manual cleaning which led to his injuries. The Court noted the franchisor presumably had actual knowledge of the long-standing unsafe working conditions because the franchisor provided training, supervision, inspections, equipment, cooking supplies and procedures for operation of the restaurant. The franchisor argued it did not control daily operations and therefore had no legal duty to the employee. But the court disagreed and held it was reasonable to infer the franchisor had control over the equipment and procedures that contributed to the injury. As a result, the franchisor owed the employee a legal duty to use reasonable care and the franchisor's conduct created a risk of physical harm.
The lawsuit and resulting ill-will between the franchisor and franchisee could have been avoided had the franchisee repaired the defective equipment when notified by the franchisor to do so.
For details about the case, read: Estate of Nathaniel Hamrick v. Restaurant Management Group, LLC.