Inside The Courts - March 2014 | Volume 6 | Issue 1

In This Issue:


..Lawson v. FMR LLC, No. 12-3 (U.S. March 4, 2014)

..Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice, No. 12-79 (U.S. Feb. 26, 2014)


..In re BP p.l.c. Sec. Litig., MDL Nos. 10-md-2185, 4:10-md-2185 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 6, 2013)

..IBEW Local 90 Pension Fund v. Deutsche Bank AG, No. 11 Civ. 4209 (KBF) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 29, 2013)


..Leyte-Vidal v. Semel, No. H037762 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 23, 2013)


..Reese v. Malone, No. 12-35260 (9th Cir. Feb. 13, 2014)

..Bartelt v. Affymax, Inc., No. 13-01025 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2014)

..Integral Dev. Corp. v. Tolat, No. 12-06575 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2013)


..Books and Records:

Cook v. Hewlett-Packard Co., No. 8667-VCG (Del. Ch. Jan. 30, 2014

..Derivative Litigation:

Cottrell v. Duke, No. 12-3871 (8th Cir. Dec. 18, 2013)

..Mergers and Acquisitions:

- In re Answers Corp. S’holders Litig., No. 6170-VCN (Del. Ch. Feb. 3, 2014)

- Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, 80 A.3d 155 (Del. Ch. Nov. 15, 2013).


..Becker v. Inland Am. Real Estate Trust, Inc., No. 13-cv-3128 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 2013)


..Tabak v. Canadian Solar Inc., No. 13-1681 (2d Cir. Dec. 20, 2013)


..City of Brockton Ret. Sys. v. CVS Caremark Corp., No. 09-cv-554 (D.R.I. Dec. 31, 2013)

..La. Mun. Police Emps. Ret. Sys., v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., No. 11-cv-289 (D. Vt. Dec. 20, 2013)


..Lead Plaintiff:

In re Lightinthebox Holding Co., No. 13 Civ. 6016 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2013)

..Pleading Standards:

Takiguchi v. MRI Int’l, Inc., No. 13-01183 (D. Nev. Dec. 11, 2013)


..Jones v. Perez, No. 13-2195-cv (2d Cir. Dec. 26, 2013)


..Freidus v. ING Groep, N.V., No. 12-4514 (2d Cir. Nov. 22, 2013)


..In re MF Global Holdings Ltd. Sec. Litig., No. 11 Civ. 7866 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 12, 2013)


..CILP Assocs., L.P. v. Lipper Convertibles, L.P., Nos. 11-4904-cv, 11-4905-cv, 11-5104-cv, 11-5106-cv (2d Cir. Nov. 8, 2013)


..United States v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc., No. 11-1565-cv (2d Cir. Oct. 25, 2013)

- Excerpt from U.S. SUPREME COURT: Lawson v. FMR LLC, No. 12-3 (U.S. March 4, 2014):

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Protections to Include Employees at Private Firms That Contract With Publicly Traded Companies:

In a 6-3 decision (Justice Ginsburg), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Sarbanes- Oxley Act’s whistleblower protections apply to employees of a public company’s private contractors and subcontractors. The question presented was whether Section 1514A of Sarbanes-Oxley, which protects employees of public companies from retaliation for reporting potential misconduct, extends to employees of a private company that works as a contractor for a public company. Two employees of a private investment advisor sought protection under Section 1514A. The employees alleged retaliation after they raised concerns related to the cost-accounting methodologies and SEC disclosures of a family of public mutual funds...

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:


Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.