In This Issue:


..Lawson v. FMR LLC, No. 12-3 (U.S. March 4, 2014)

..Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice, No. 12-79 (U.S. Feb. 26, 2014)


..In re BP p.l.c. Sec. Litig., MDL Nos. 10-md-2185, 4:10-md-2185 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 6, 2013)

..IBEW Local 90 Pension Fund v. Deutsche Bank AG, No. 11 Civ. 4209 (KBF) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 29, 2013)


..Leyte-Vidal v. Semel, No. H037762 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 23, 2013)


..Reese v. Malone, No. 12-35260 (9th Cir. Feb. 13, 2014)

..Bartelt v. Affymax, Inc., No. 13-01025 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2014)

..Integral Dev. Corp. v. Tolat, No. 12-06575 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2013)


..Books and Records:

Cook v. Hewlett-Packard Co., No. 8667-VCG (Del. Ch. Jan. 30, 2014

..Derivative Litigation:

Cottrell v. Duke, No. 12-3871 (8th Cir. Dec. 18, 2013)

..Mergers and Acquisitions:

- In re Answers Corp. S’holders Litig., No. 6170-VCN (Del. Ch. Feb. 3, 2014)

- Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, 80 A.3d 155 (Del. Ch. Nov. 15, 2013).


..Becker v. Inland Am. Real Estate Trust, Inc., No. 13-cv-3128 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 2013)


..Tabak v. Canadian Solar Inc., No. 13-1681 (2d Cir. Dec. 20, 2013)


..City of Brockton Ret. Sys. v. CVS Caremark Corp., No. 09-cv-554 (D.R.I. Dec. 31, 2013)

..La. Mun. Police Emps. Ret. Sys., v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., No. 11-cv-289 (D. Vt. Dec. 20, 2013)


..Lead Plaintiff:

In re Lightinthebox Holding Co., No. 13 Civ. 6016 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2013)

..Pleading Standards:

Takiguchi v. MRI Int’l, Inc., No. 13-01183 (D. Nev. Dec. 11, 2013)


..Jones v. Perez, No. 13-2195-cv (2d Cir. Dec. 26, 2013)


..Freidus v. ING Groep, N.V., No. 12-4514 (2d Cir. Nov. 22, 2013)


..In re MF Global Holdings Ltd. Sec. Litig., No. 11 Civ. 7866 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 12, 2013)


..CILP Assocs., L.P. v. Lipper Convertibles, L.P., Nos. 11-4904-cv, 11-4905-cv, 11-5104-cv, 11-5106-cv (2d Cir. Nov. 8, 2013)


..United States v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc., No. 11-1565-cv (2d Cir. Oct. 25, 2013)

- Excerpt from U.S. SUPREME COURT: Lawson v. FMR LLC, No. 12-3 (U.S. March 4, 2014):

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Protections to Include Employees at Private Firms That Contract With Publicly Traded Companies:

In a 6-3 decision (Justice Ginsburg), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Sarbanes- Oxley Act’s whistleblower protections apply to employees of a public company’s private contractors and subcontractors. The question presented was whether Section 1514A of Sarbanes-Oxley, which protects employees of public companies from retaliation for reporting potential misconduct, extends to employees of a private company that works as a contractor for a public company. Two employees of a private investment advisor sought protection under Section 1514A. The employees alleged retaliation after they raised concerns related to the cost-accounting methodologies and SEC disclosures of a family of public mutual funds...

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.