Iowa Joins Growing List to Offer Potential Safe Harbor for Companies With Security Programs

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Contact

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

[co-author: Kathryn Smith*]

Iowa recently became the fifth state to offer businesses a safe harbor if they have a written cybersecurity program. Others are Connecticut (October 1, 2021), Ohio (effective November 2, 2018), Oregon (effective January 1, 2020), and Utah (effective March 5, 2021). Like these, as of July 1, 2023, businesses that have a written cybersecurity program and suffer a breach may have an affirmative defense in Iowa against tort claims for inadequate security measures.

To take advantage of the safe harbor, the company must have a written cybersecurity program that contains certain elements. The program must, inter alia:

  • Evaluate and mitigate anticipated risks on a continual basis
  • Be of an appropriate scope and scale, measured by it costing “no less than [the company’s] most recently calculated maximum probable loss value”
  • Assess -at least annually- the potential maximum probable loss from a breach
  • In the event of a breach, provide that the company will tell impacted parties what steps they can take “to reduce any damages”

These elements mirror those expected under other state safe harbor laws, but are more detailed than we have seen in the past. Program that reasonably conform to an industry recognized cybersecurity framework will be deemed to have a qualifying program.[1] These industry programs include the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, FedRAMP and ISO/IEC 2700. Businesses regulated by -and adhering to- several well-known laws will also be viewed as having a sufficient program. These include both HIPAA And GLBA.

*Kathryn Smith is a fellow in the firm’s Chicago office.

Putting it into Practice: Iowa’s safe harbor law picks up from similar provisions last passed by a state in 2021 (Connecticut). As the cost of breach-related lawsuits continues to rise, these provisions can offer some comfort to companies. We will be watching to see if other states begin incorporating similar provisions in their breach notice laws.


[1] 554G.3(1).

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Contact
more
less

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide