IRS Issues Rules for Recognizing Same-Sex Spouses under Retirement Plans


Last week, the Internal Revenue Service issued Notice 2014-19, which sets forth the rules for recognition of same-sex spouses in retirement plan administration, as required under the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in U.S. vs. Windsor, which struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act. Most significantly, the guidance does not require plan sponsors to retroactively apply same-sex spousal recognition standards prior to June 26, 2013 (the date of the Windsor decision), but does allow for optional retroactive application of such standards prior to June 26, 2013.

Notice 2014-19 requires qualified retirement plans to recognize the same-sex spouse of a participant as of June 26, 2013, for purposes of:

  • Providing survivor benefits
  • Obtaining spousal consent
  • Making required minimum distributions
  • Accepting qualified domestic relations orders
  • Issuing hardship withdrawals
  • Carrying out other retirement plan administrative functions

Notice 2014-19 also confirms that retirement plan administrators must use the "state of commitment" standard in determining same-sex spouses as of September 16, 2013. Qualified retirement plans that choose not to recognize same-sex spouses before June 26, 2013 will not be subject to plan disqualification or face penalties as a result of this decision.

Qualified retirement plans whose terms are inconsistent with U.S. v. Windsor and the state of commitment standard must be amended to comply with the ruling and standard. Generally speaking, non-governmental single employer plans have until December 31, 2014 to adopt an amendment.

In the case of governmental plans, an amendment must be adopted no later than the close of the first regular legislative session of the legislative body with amendment authority that ends after December 31, 2014. A required plan amendment can be adopted regardless of whether the plan would otherwise be subject to limitations set forth under Section 436 of the Internal Revenue Code (which deals with funding-based limits on plan benefits).

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.