Multi-Firm Statement in Response to 1940 Act Suits Against SPACs

Mayer Brown Free Writings + Perspectives
Contact

Mayer Brown Free Writings + Perspectives

Today, 49 law firms, including Mayer Brown, signed a joint statement responding to a recent action against a SPAC asserting that SPACs are investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940 because proceeds from their IPOs are invested in short-term US Treasury securities and qualifying money market funds.

The signing law firms view the assertion that SPACs are investment companies as without factual or legal basis and believe that a SPAC is not an investment company under the 1940 Act if it (i) follows its stated business plan of identifying and engaging in a business combination with one or more operating companies within a specified period of time and (ii) holds short-term US Treasury securities and qualifying money market funds in its trust account pending completion of its initial business combination.

Read the joint statement.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Mayer Brown Free Writings + Perspectives | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Mayer Brown Free Writings + Perspectives
Contact
more
less

Mayer Brown Free Writings + Perspectives on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide