New Year, New Obligations in British Columbia to Maintain Employment for (Some) Injured Workers

Stikeman Elliott LLP
Contact

Stikeman Elliott LLP

On January 1, 2024, changes to British Columbia’s Workers Compensation Act, introducing a duty to accommodate and maintain employment for certain injured workers, came into effect. For details on the rest of the changes brought in by the Workers Compensation Amendment Act (No. 2) in 2022, see our initial blog here.

Duty to Accommodate and Return Injured Workers to Work In Effect

Effective January 1, 2024, British Columbia employers and injured workers have a mutual duty to cooperate in the worker’s return to work. Specifically, they will need to establish and maintain communication as soon as practicable after the injury occurs; identify suitable work for the worker that, if possible, restores their pre-injury wages; and apprise WorkSafeBC of the worker’s return to work or continuation of work. Either party may request that WorkSafeBC investigate a failure to cooperate, and WorkSafeBC may impose remedies, including reducing or suspending payments of compensation to the worker until they comply with their obligations.

This duty to cooperate applies to workers who sustained injuries no earlier than January 1, 2022, except that the obligation to contact applies as soon as practicable after January 1, 2024, and not as soon as practicable after the worker was injured.

Further, employers will have a duty to return injured workers back to their pre-injury work or otherwise provide alternative work of a kind and at wages that are comparable to the worker's pre-injury work. Additionally, to facilitate the return, employers must accommodate injured workers with any necessary changes to their work or the workplace up to the point of undue hardship. This duty to accommodate is separate from the existing accommodation duty under the Human Rights Code.

These new duties to maintain employment and accommodate apply only to employers with 20 or more workers, and in respect of workers with at least 12 months of continuous service before their injury (including full-time or part-time service). These duties expire 2 years after the date of injury if the worker has not returned to work or if the worker is carrying out suitable work. Additionally, these requirements apply in relation to a worker who sustained an injury no earlier than July 1, 2023.

If an employer terminates the returned worker within 6 months of their return, the employer is deemed to have breached its statutory duties unless the employer can demonstrate that the termination was unrelated to the worker’s injury. However, this reverse onus provision does not apply to workers terminated before January 1, 2024. If the employer breaches the duty to maintain employment, WorkSafeBC may provide the worker with an amount equivalent to one year’s compensation under the temporary total or partial disability provisions of the Workers Compensation Act.

Takeaways for Employers

Although these new obligations are similar to and overlap with existing accommodation requirements under the Human Rights Code, employers will nonetheless want to revisit their workplace injury and accommodation policies to ensure they comply with these new statutory requirements. In particular, although the obligations are not retroactive, they apply to existing injuries that arose prior to January 1, 2024, such that employers will need to promptly engage in any cooperation and accommodation of workers with such injuries, to the extent that they have not already done so in line with accommodation requirements under the Human Rights Code.

Unionized employers should also be aware that to the extent these statutory obligations conflict with the provisions of a collective agreement, the statutory obligations will prevail to the extent they provide a greater benefit to the worker than the collective agreement. However, the statutory obligations do not operate to displace any provision dealing with seniority of employees (i.e. accommodation of an employee with alternative suitable work could not operate to bump employees with seniority rights to such alternative work).

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Stikeman Elliott LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Stikeman Elliott LLP
Contact
more
less

Stikeman Elliott LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide