Plan Sponsors’ Decision to Change Form of Employer Contributions Not A Fiduciary Function

The Second Circuit recently held that Morgan Stanley and others were not de facto ERISA fiduciaries by virtue of having authority and means to fund company contributions with stock rather than cash. In so ruling, the Court explained that at the time of the decision to fund contributions with company stock, the stock was not a plan asset and thus the decision to fund company contributions with stock was not a fiduciary act. The Court also dismissed conflict of interest claims against the Chairman of the Board of Directors because such claims are not viable when based solely on the fact that compensation was linked to the company’s stock. The case is Coulter v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10027 (2nd Cir. May 29, 2014).

 

Topics:  Benefit Plan Sponsors, Employee Benefits, ERISA, Morgan Stanley

Published In: Business Torts Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Labor & Employment Updates, Securities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Proskauer - ERISA Practice Center | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »