PTAB Strategies and Insights - April 2019: Supreme Court Sua Sponte Reverses Alice …We Wish

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Contact

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

IPO published the following announcement on April 1st:

Today the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it is reversing its infamous 2014 decision on patent eligibility in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank and remanding. The court took the action sua sponte without the filing of any motion by either party. After determining that the U.S. Constitution vests within the U.S. Supreme Court the power to change its own final judgment after five years, the Court explained the defect in its original opinion. “The repeated use of the term ‘abstract idea’ in the original opinion doesn’t make sense. Every idea is abstract! And every invention makes use of some idea, right?” It remanded the case to the Federal Circuit to devise a clearer test for patent eligibility.

Editor’s note: Happy April Fool’s Day!

We could only wish. Several 101 related decisions have recently been issued by the Federal Circuit, one in particular baffling many readers.

The baffling case in which the patent in suit was found ineligible was ChargePoint, where the patents were directed to electric vehicle charging stations that connected to a network. The claims included “An apparatus, comprising … a control device …; a transceiver … ; and a controller.” Apparently this was not enough to keep it from a 101 challenge and invalidation as the Federal Circuit stated “[b]ut network control is the abstract idea itself” and “a claimed invention’s use of the ineligible concept to which it is directed cannot supply the inventive concept that renders the invention ‘significantly more’ than that ineligible concept.”

Around this same time three cases found subject matter to be eligible: Endo, Natural Alternatives, and SRI. And, one additional case did not: Trading Technologies.

Perhaps most troubling to patent practitioners was reasoning in some of these cases that was contradictory to the USPTO’s recently released guidelines on this same issue. The USPTO guidelines indicated it was summarizing and compiling the Federal Circuit precedent.

Given the continued murky situation around subject matter eligibility, it looks like we will all be in for more ‘wait and see.’ Meanwhile, several members of Congress also appear ready to take up this issue.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Contact
more
less

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide