Real Property Update

• Quiet Title / Motion to Dismiss: Trial court not permitted to consider or take judicial notice of amended lis pendens and partial release of mortgage that were outside the counterclaim to which a motion to dismiss was directed – Migliazzo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 2D18-655 (Fla. 2d DCA Jan. 24, 2020) (reversing dismissal of counterclaim of quiet title)
• Foreclosure / Sua Sponte Dismissal: Dismissal was procedurally improper and Yelen v. Bankers Trust Co., 476 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), was not controlling where language in due-on-sale clause differed from that in Yelen; due-on-sale clause did not contain language requiring voluntary transfer “by borrower,” but rather encompassed any and all transfers of the subject property – Bank of N.Y. Mellon Corp. v. Hernandez, No. 3D19-328 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 22, 2020) (reversed and remanded)
• Property Appraisal / Settlement Agreement: Trial court erred in determining landowner was entitled to a reduction in property appraisal market value where conveyance and release agreement was only available to those who owned a qualifying residence before the effective date; landowner only had a concrete foundation on his property, which was not a “residence” – Broward Cty. v. Font, No. 4D19-150 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 22, 2020) (reversed and remanded)

Financial Services

• FDCPA / Pleading Sufficiency: Plaintiff’s second amended complaint failed to state an FDCPA claim when it failed to establish that either defendant is a debt collector beyond the assertion of vague and boilerplate allegations, and it asserted in only a vague and conclusory manner that defendants’ conduct qualified as abusive and oppressive conduct without describing such conduct engaged by either defendant – Ponthieux v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00608 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2020) (recommending dismissal motion be granted in part)
• FCRA / Pleading Sufficiency: While complaint sufficiently stated claim for defendant’s negligent violation of the FCRA, it failed to state a claim for defendant’s willful violation of the FCRA because it did not sufficiently plead that defendant knowingly or recklessly failed to follow reasonable procedures – Mader v. Experian Info. Sols., LLC, No. 1:19-cv-03787 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 17, 2020) (granting in part and denying in part defendant’s dismissal motion)
• ECOA: Plaintiff did not identify any specific policy or practice by defendants, nor any adverse impact on African Americans, to support a disparate treatment claim under the ECOA – Guy v. Auto. Ins. Co. of Hartford Conn., No. 1:18-cv-02620 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2020) (granting defendants’ motions to dismiss)

Title Insurance

• No cases of interest to report.