Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending May 24, 2019

Carlton Fields
Contact

Carlton Fields

Real Property Update

  • Attorneys' Fees / Voluntary Dismissal: it is an exception to the general rule that when a plaintiff voluntarily dismisses an action the defendant is the prevailing party, when both parties compromised in agreeing to a settlement to end their litigation - Valencia Golf & Country Club Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc. v. Cmty. Res. Servs., Inc., No. 2D17-4986 (Fla. 1st DCA May 22, 2019) (reversed)
  • Attorneys' Fees / Voluntary Dismissal / Foreclosure: borrower entitled to attorneys' fees as prevailing party, where bank voluntarily dismissed its case and there was never a judicial determination by trial court that bank was not a party to the contract (note and mortgage). Venezia v. JP Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp., No. 4D18-1278 (Fla. 4th DCA May 22, 2019) (reversed and remanded)

Financial Services Update

  • Rooker-Feldman Doctrine: pursuant to Rooker-Feldman doctrine preventing a federal court from reviewing state court decisions, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a district court's dismissal of a borrower's lawsuit against a lender and servicer seeking declaration that mortgage loan was rescinded because a prior foreclosure lawsuit in state court between the parties resulted in a final judgment - Zamore v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., No. 18-13635 (11th Cir. 2019)
  • TILA: borrower's notice of rescission pursuant to TILA was not proper and was nullified by borrowers continuing to make payments - Madura v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., No. 18-11716 (11th Cir. May 15, 2019)
  • Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act: merchant that prints more than five digits of a credit card number in violation of FACTA causes the person whose account number is disclosed to suffer a concrete injury sufficient to confer standing to that person to pursue claim - Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc., Nos. 16-16486, 16-16783 (11th Cir. 2019)

Title Insurance Update

  • Insurance law: New York insurance law prohibiting certain mortgage lenders from requiring borrowers to obtain title insurance from a specific title insurer, agent, or broker did not apply where transaction was between a seller and a purchaser of real property - Wenig Saltiel, LLP v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, 2016-3083 RIC (Sup. Ct. App. N.Y. May 10, 2019) (affirming dismissal)

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Carlton Fields | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Carlton Fields
Contact
more
less

Carlton Fields on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide