Recent Decision Calls “At-Will Disclaimers” Into Question Under NLRA


[author: Joseph S. Sileo]

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) continues its quest to protect (read: expand) employee rights, even in non-union settings, this time by attacking at-will employment disclaimers.  It is common for employers to include at-will employment disclaimers in employee handbooks.  Typically, these statements include an acknowledgment that the employment relationship is terminable at-will and that the employer can change employment terms at any time.

In a recent decision, an NLRB Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) determined that the American Red Cross Arizona Blood Services Region violated Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA by including an at-will disclaimer acknowledgement in its employee handbook.  The acknowledgement at issue included  typical disclaimer language defining at-will employment, along with a statement that the employee “agree[s] that the at-will employment relationship cannot be amended, modified or altered in any way.”  Employees were required to sign the acknowledgment following receipt of the handbook.


The ALJ considered whether the at-will disclaimer violated Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA by analyzing “whether the rule would reasonably tend to chill employees in the exercise of [their rights to engage in protected concerted activities].” The ALJ concluded that there was “no doubt” employees would reasonably construe the disclaimer language to prohibit certain protected activity under the Act.  More specifically, the ALJ reasoned that the disclaimer operated as a waiver by which employees relinquished their rights under the Act.  The disclaimer, in the opinion of the ALJ, conveyed to employees the unlawful message that continued employment was conditioned on agreement that they not enter into any contract (including a union contract) or engage in efforts to alter the at-will employment relationship.  The ALJ concluded that the employer violated the Act because its at-will disclaimer “chilled” the  exercise of employee rights, including the rights to collectively negotiate new employment terms, seek union representation or a collective bargaining agreement.


This case illustrates the NLRB’s continued focus on expanding its reach and enforcement efforts into the non-union employment setting.  Other recent examples include restricting an employer’s right to discipline employees for disparaging social media postings and prohibiting employers from instructing employees to maintain confidentiality in connection with workplace investigations.  These rulings are also based on the theory that such employer actions violate employees’ Section 7 rights.  These decisions require employers to keep NLRA rights in mind when communicating with employees (including non-union employees) about their rights and obligations.  In light of the NLRA’s new crusade on these issues, employers are well-advised to carefully draft disclaimers and similar employee communications in a manner that would withstand scrutiny by the NLRB.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.