‘S Wonderful, ‘S Marvelous, ‘S Unreasonable


One of the reasons to choose an S-Corp instead of an LLC is tax savings.  An S-corp does not pay any taxes at the corporate level, but instead all income is passed through to the shareholders, who are responsible for a number of taxes on both salary and dividends (return on investment).

The IRS and Department of Labor are cooperating to investigate companies that misclassify employees as independent contractors to try to avoid paying taxes.  The heightened scrutiny on payroll withholdings could make S-Corporations more likely to be audited.

Stack of Money

(Photo credit: 401(K) 2013)

With the S-Corp structure, the owners can take a “reasonable” salary (which is subject to both income tax, and, generally speaking, withholdings for social security, Medicare, and unemployment taxes). After the reasonable salary is paid, the owners can distribute the remainder of the profits, which are subject only to income tax.  These distributions are not treated as self-employment income, which is a tax advantage over LLCs, partnerships and sole proprietorships.

Determining what is a reasonable salary is tricky. Paying no salary compensation will trigger an audit, but so will paying too little salary compensation.  The IRS could recharacterize the resulting distributions as wages, and attach penalties for not withholding and paying proper payroll taxes.

Some shareholders decide not treat themselves as employees, but hire themselves as independent contractors to save on the payroll taxes. This can trigger an audit, and significant penalties for misclassification of workers.

As a general rule, zero salary is unreasonable as is a salary below the minimum wage.

The IRS will consider the following factors to determine whether a salary is reasonable (or too low):

  1. Employee qualifications;
  2. The nature, extent, and scope of the employee’s work;
  3. The size and complexity of the business;
  4. Prevailing general economic conditions;
  5. The employee’s compensation as a percentage of gross and net income;
  6. The employee-shareholder’s compensation compared with distributions to shareholders;
  7. The employee-shareholder’s compensation compared with that to non-shareholder employees or paid in prior years;
  8. Prevailing rates of compensation for comparable positions in comparable concerns; and
  9. Comparison of compensation paid to a particular shareholder-employee in previous years where the corporation has a limited number of officers.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sands Anderson PC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.