Seventh Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Student-Athletes’ Claim for Compensation

Saul Ewing LLP
Contact

The Seventh Circuit upheld the dismissal of claims brought by two former University of Pennsylvania student-athletes against the NCAA and more than 120 NCAA Division I universities and colleges, alleging that student athletes are employees entitled to a minimum wage under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).  
 
While acknowledging that student-athletes spend a tremendous amount of time playing for their schools, the Seventh Circuit held that “student-athletic ‘play’ is not ‘work,’ at least as the term is used in the FLSA [and] Appellants in this case have not, and quite frankly cannot, allege that the activities they pursued as student-athletes qualify as ‘work’ sufficient to trigger the minimum wage requirements of the FLSA.”  The Seventh Circuit’s Opinion noted the long tradition of amateurism in college sports, which it found by definition, shows that student athletes participate in their sports for reasons wholly unrelated to immediate compensation, without any real expectation of earning an income. 
 
The Seventh Circuit also observed that its ruling is in line with a majority of courts, which have likewise held that student athletes are not employees.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Saul Ewing LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Saul Ewing LLP
Contact
more
less

Saul Ewing LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide