Shareholder Lawsuit About Compensation Plan Derails Annual Meeting

An SEC registrant recently announced it had delayed its annual meeting from June 12, 2014 to September 11, 2014 because of this lawsuit.

What’s the lawsuit about? Plaintiffs claim the company, a Delaware corporation, did not count abstentions as “no” votes when the most recent increase in the share reserve was put to the shareholders at a special meeting in February 2013, which as an aside nearly tripled the share reserve.

And it makes a difference, because the complaint and SEC filings disclose 77,011,739 shares were voted for the plan amendment, 57,907,345 shares were voted against and there were 36,252,581 abstentions, and no broker non-votes. There were no broker non-votes because it was a special meeting that did not have any routine proposals on the agenda on which brokers could vote.

The complaint alleges the abstention should be counted as a “no” because abstentions result from shares that are entitled to vote, but decided not to, and goes onto to cite three pages of authorities in support of plaintiff’s position.

It doesn’t look like the Company ever filed an S-8 to register the shares, so there is no legal opinion to look at to see if a law firm supported the defendants’ position.

The complaint then goes on to paint a dark picture, alleging that after the defendants realized this defect, they amended their by-laws to support their position.

For the meeting which is delayed, the company has requested another 30 million share increase in the plan reserve. The plaintiff claims the most recent proxy statement is false and misleading because, among other things, it does not disclose the 2013 vote did not properly increase the reserve under the stock plan.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Stinson Leonard Street - Dodd-Frank and the Jobs Act | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Stinson Leonard Street - Dodd-Frank and the Jobs Act on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.