Stating the Obvious

Sherman & Howard L.L.C.
Contact

An employee who is legally restricted from driving because of seizures is not “qualified” for a job that requires the employee to spend fifty percent of working hours on the road. In Minnihan v. Mediacom Communications Corp., No. 14-1109 (8th Cir. March 9, 2015), the employee wanted his employer to reallocate his driving responsibilities to other employees. Instead, the employer offered to reassign the employee to a non-driving position with comparable pay and benefits. The employee declined the offer and sued the employer. Common sense prevailed. The ADA does not require employers to reallocate the essential functions of a job. Where an employee spends half of his day visiting job sites, as in Minnihan, driving is an essential function of the job. To state the obvious, the employee’s claim failed.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Sherman & Howard L.L.C.

Written by:

Sherman & Howard L.L.C.
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Sherman & Howard L.L.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide