Supreme Court Issues Significant Decisions in the Limelight Networks and Nautilus Cases Unanimously Overturning the Federal Circuit

The Supreme Court recently issued two unanimous decisions concerning the standards governing claims for induced infringement and indefiniteness. A summary of the decisions follows.

Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.

In Limelight Networks, the Supreme Court decided that a party could not be liable for inducing another party to infringe a patent when there was no direct infringement.

Please see full memo below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Akamai Technologies, Claim Construction, En Banc Review, Induced Infringement, Limelight Networks, Miniauction, Nautilus Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Patent Infringement, Patent Litigation, Patents, SCOTUS

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Shearman & Sterling LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »