Supreme Court Unanimously Overrules the Federal Circuit’s Fee-Shifting Framework in Patent Cases


Today, the Supreme Court issued two unanimous decisions that considerably relax the standard for awarding attorney’s fees against plaintiffs who bring meritless patent suits. These decisions are timely given the ongoing debate in Congress regarding the inclusion of a “fee-shifting” provision in the pending patent reform legislation.

Under 35 U.S.C. § 285, a district court has discretion to award attorney’s fees to a prevailing party in a patent case if the court determines that the case is “exceptional.” Under the standard crafted in Brooks Furniture Manufacturing., Inc. v. Dutailier International, Inc., attorney’s fees previously were awarded against the patentee only if the suit was (1) objectively baseless, and (2) brought in subjective bad faith, absent misconduct during litigation or inequitable conduct before the Patent and Trademark Office.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.