The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in Unión de Empleados de Muelles de Puerto Rico PRSSA Welfare Plan, v. UBS Financial Services Inc. of Puerto Rico, No. 11-1605, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 49818 (1st Cir. Jan. 4, 2013), recently applied a stricter independence standard for fund directors and their business relationships in the context of shareholder derivative litigation against investment advisers. The Court’s ruling may heighten courts’ scrutiny of board directors’ current and prospective business relationships with investment advisers and their affiliates.
Shareholders in a derivative action must first make a demand on the board before filing a complaint or plead why such demand would be futile. Demand is futile when a majority of the board is comprised of directors who cannot consider the lawsuit impartially. Failure to properly plead “demand futility” often leads to the dismissal of shareholder derivative actions.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Appeals, Board of Directors, Demand Futility, Derivative Suit, Investment Adviser, Pensions, Shareholder Demands, Shareholder Litigation
Published In: Business Organization Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Labor & Employment Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Dechert LLP | Attorney Advertising