In this issue:

- Questions Left Unanswered by Louboutin Case

- Supreme Court Rules on Covenant Not to Sue

- An Eye for Fashion: New York Magazine Presents New York’s

- Women Leaders in the Law

- Anonymous Comments Allowed as Evidence of Confusion

- Media Spotlight: Becoming a Fashion Designer

- Excerpt from: Questions Left Unanswered by Louboutin Case:

The most highly anticipated case in the fashion world in 2012 was Christian Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent, in which footwear designer Christian Louboutin sued design house Yves Saint Laurent over footwear incorporating a red sole, claiming that it infringed Louboutin’s trademark registration covering a lacquered red sole on footwear.

Please see full newsletter below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Christian Louboutin, Covenant Not to Sue, Evidence, Fashion Industry, Likelihood of Confusion, Nike, Registration, SCOTUS, Trademarks, USPTO

Published In: Art, Entertainment & Sports Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


Reporters on Deadline