Third Point LLC v. Ruprecht — Activism Confronts the Rights Plan

The Delaware Court of Chancery refuses to enjoin Sotheby’s annual meeting and allows Sotheby’s “poison pill” to protect against an activist’s proxy contest.

Implications for our Clients -

In a thirty year-long series of decisions beginning with Moran v. Household International, Inc., 500 A.2d 1346 (Del. 1985), the Delaware courts have affirmed the value of shareholder rights plans to boards seeking to protect and maximize shareholder value. While the ruling in Third Point is on a preliminary basis, the decision demonstrates that independent directors acting in good faith and on an informed basis with the advice of outside advisors should be afforded substantial latitude to adopt and maintain rights plans with features responsive to the threats to corporations posed by activist hedge funds.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Board of Directors, Proxy Contests, Shareholder Litigation, Shareholders, Sothebys

Published In: Business Torts Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Securities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Latham & Watkins LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »