Two Classes of Annuity Providers Do Not Violate § 403(b) Universal Availability Requirement

more+
less-

In Private Letter Ruling 201142033 (July 25, 2011), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ruled that the IRC § 403(b) universal availability requirement was not violated merely because (i) a university system made available two classes of annuity providers and (ii) some employees could access both classes of providers, and other employees could access only one class.

-- The university system adopted a consolidated § 403(b) program for all its campuses and selected annuity providers that were available to all employees.

-- Previously, each campus in the system administered a separate § 403(b) program with differing annuity providers. An employee with an existing contract with one of these providers was allowed either to continue making salary reduction contributions to that contract (so long as that provider executed the requisite information sharing agreement under the § 403(b) regulations) or to select a new provider under the consolidated program.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×