Two Classes of Annuity Providers Do Not Violate § 403(b) Universal Availability Requirement

more+
less-

In Private Letter Ruling 201142033 (July 25, 2011), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ruled that the IRC § 403(b) universal availability requirement was not violated merely because (i) a university system made available two classes of annuity providers and (ii) some employees could access both classes of providers, and other employees could access only one class.

-- The university system adopted a consolidated § 403(b) program for all its campuses and selected annuity providers that were available to all employees.

-- Previously, each campus in the system administered a separate § 403(b) program with differing annuity providers. An employee with an existing contract with one of these providers was allowed either to continue making salary reduction contributions to that contract (so long as that provider executed the requisite information sharing agreement under the § 403(b) regulations) or to select a new provider under the consolidated program.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Education Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Labor & Employment Updates, Tax Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »