U.S. Supreme Court Issues Ruling in In re Bellingham

more+
less-

On June 9, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Exec. Benefits Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Arkison (In re Bellingham Ins. Agency, Inc.), 573 U.S. ___ (2014), affirming the Ninth Circuit and holding that, while the Constitution does not permit a bankruptcy court to issue a final ruling in certain circumstances, it is permitted to issue proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to be reviewed de novo by the district court.

This case arose out of uncertainty after the Court's prior ruling in Stern v. Marshall, 131 S.Ct. 2594 (2011). In Stern, the Supreme Court held that Article III of the Constitution prohibits a bankruptcy court from entering a final adjudication on certain claims. The Court did not, however, offer direction on how bankruptcy courts should proceed when faced with "Stern claims" (i.e., claims in which a bankruptcy court is statutorily authorized to issue a final ruling, but is constitutionally prohibited from doing so).

Please see full Publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Burr & Forman | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Burr & Forman on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×