USPTO Issues Guidance on Impact of SAS on AIA Trial Proceedings

Knobbe Martens
Contact

Knobbe Martens

On April 26, 2018, the USPTO issued a one-page guidance document on the impact of the Supreme Court’s recent decision, SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, on AIA trial proceedings.

As has been widely reported, SAS reversed the PTAB’s long-standing practice of deciding institution of IPR challenges on a claim-by-claim basis. Now, the decision whether to institute an IPR is an all-or-nothing choice, either requiring the denial of the entire petition, or institution and subsequent final written decision on all claims challenged in the petition.

According to the new guidance, the panel of judges in an IPR may issue an order supplementing the institution decision when necessary to institute on all challenges raised in the petition. When such an order is issued, the panel may take further action to manage the proceeding, including, for example, permitting additional time, briefing, discovery, or oral argument, depending on the circumstances and stage of the proceeding. For example, the response deadline for a Patent Owner Response might be extended to enable the Patent Owner to address any newly instituted claims.

Once the PTAB issues an order supplementing the institution decision, the PTAB expects the parties to meet and confer and then ask the PTAB for additional briefing and any adjustments to the trial schedule. Importantly, the guidance indicates that while the PTAB may act on its own, the parties should not expect additional briefing or schedule adjustments if they do not ask for them. As is customary, a conference call with the panel may be requested to address any disputes.

SAS has the potential for enormous impact on all stages of AIA proceedings, from pre-filing considerations through appeal. Thus, the USPTO’s short one-page guidance, issued one day after SAS was decided, should likely be viewed as preliminary guidance. It is expected that the USPTO will continue to refine its approach to this case in the coming weeks and months.

The guidelines are available at this link: https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/guidance_

on_the_impact_of_sas_on_aia_trial_proceedings_%20%28april_26%2C_2018%29.pdf.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Knobbe Martens | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Knobbe Martens
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Knobbe Martens on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide