In This Issue:
- Whistleblower’s one-two punch: Confidential informant/employee spurs criminal investigation, then successfully sues individual company owner in qui tam action
- Alleged illegal recruiting for college leads to False Claims Act complaint
- Court enforces False Claims Act’s first-to-file rule to bar complaint alleging details of off-label promotion scheme about which another relator had previously complained.
- Excerpt from Whistleblower’s one-two punch:
In a stark reminder of the importance of a robust compliance program, a former employee whose disclosures to the FBI launched a criminal prosecution became the successful plaintiff in a qui tam motion for summary judgment against one of the individual owners of the now-defunct company.
Please see full newsletter below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Colleges, Criminal Prosecution, False Claims Act, First-to-File, Hiring & Firing, Qui Tam, Recruitment Policies, Whistleblowers, White Collar Crimes
Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, Criminal Law Updates, Education Updates, Labor & Employment Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Saul Ewing LLP | Attorney Advertising