With A Focus On Fraud, California Federal Court Finds Song-Beverly Act Does Not Apply to Online Transactions

more+
less-

The California Supreme Court’s February 2011 decision in Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc. spawned hundreds of lawsuits against brick-and-mortar retailers complaining that retailers collected customers’ “personal identification information” (PII) in violation of the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act (the “Act”). Pineda also triggered a wave of lawsuits against online businesses, raising the question of whether the Act applies to online transactions. In a case brought against Microsoft Corporation, a California federal court has recently answered that question in the negative — reasoning that Pineda supports the conclusion that online transactions are outside the scope of the Act.

On January 6, 2012, the United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed a case against Microsoft Corporation on the grounds that the Act does not apply to online transactions. On the same day, the Court dismissed a similar case against Redbox Automated Retail, LLC holding that the Act does not apply to transactions involving self-service DVD kiosks. The Court’s analysis in both cases was similar, focusing on the statutory language and purpose of the Act.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

more+
less-

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×