House of Raeford Farms to Pay $52,000 To Settle EEOC Disability Discrimination Suit -


Poultry Processor Fired Employee Because of Her Anemia, Federal Agency Charged

WILMINGTON, N.C. -- House of Raeford Farms, Inc., a poultry processor, will pay $52,000 and provide other relief to settle a disability discrimination lawsuit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today. The EEOC had charged that House of Raeford violated federal law by discriminating against an employee because of her disability.

According to the EEOC's lawsuit, Erica Sutton, who has anemia, was employed by House of Raeford on a box construction line. On May 24, 2011, the box line employees were moved to the debone department, which is a cold environment. Sutton informed her supervisor that she could not work in a cold environment due to her anemia, asking to work in a warmer environment. The EEOC said that instead of assigning Sutton to a vacant position in a warmer environment, House of Raeford sent Sutton home until she could provide a doctor's note stating that she had been diagnosed with anemia. The EEOC charged that instead of allowing Sutton time to get the doctor's note, House of Raeford fired her on June 1. The EEOC also charged that House of Raeford unlawfully disclosed Sutton's confidential medical information.

Such alleged conduct violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which protects employees from discrimination based on their disabilities and requires employers to provide disabled employees with reasonable accommodations unless it would be an undue hardship on the employer to do so. The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Southern Division (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.; Civil Action No. 7:13-CV-00183) after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.

In addition to the monetary damages, which total $52,073.54, the two-year consent decree settling the suit requires that House of Raeford develop a discrimination policy which includes the ADA. In addition, House of Raeford will provide annual training to its managers and supervisors at its Rose Hill facility on the ADA and post an employee notice at the facility concerning the lawsuit and employee rights under federal anti-discrimination laws.

"This case reminds employers that a reasonable accommodation can be as simple as allowing an employee sufficient time to secure a doctor's note," said Lynette A. Barnes, regional attorney for the EEOC's Charlotte District. "Following that simple requirement of the ADA could have saved the employer as well as the employee a lot of needless trouble. In addition, employers need to be reminded that an employee's medical information must be kept confidential."

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Further information about the EEOC is available on the agency's web site at



Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.