Ninth Circuit Affirms Largest Ever Class Action: What Does It Mean to You?


The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (covering California and eight other Western states) in Dukes v. Wal-Mart, 2010 WL 1644259 (9th Cir. April 26, 2010), affirmed the certification of the largest class action in history. The plaintiffs claim Wal-Mart has “rolled back” pay and promotions for women across the country. At the time of certification, the class encompassed approximately 1.5 million women, and damages could reach the multi-billion dollar range. While affirming certification, the Ninth Circuit remanded the case for the lower court to reconsider whether individuals no longer employed by Wal-Mart at the time the case was filed can remain in the class and whether the class can pursue punitive damages.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Miller & Martin PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Miller & Martin PLLC on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.